Essay about LAWS 310 Week 7 Assignment You Deci - 1179 Words

Widget Tech Inc. Code of Ethics Professor: Tonya Floyd LAWS 310 Devry University Review of Widget Tech Inc. Code of Ethics Table of Contents Summary†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..3 Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦3 How to Create a Code of Ethics†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.....†¦....†¦4 Components of a Code of Ethics†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ .†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦4 Conclusion†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.....6 Sources†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.7 Summary Widget Tech Inc. is in need of update the company’s current code of ethics due to growth of the company and the changing workforce. Research has been conducted to revise the current policy and address topics that were previously†¦show more content†¦Code of Ethics it is apparent that the company’s codes of ethics are out of date and in need of restoration, there are several changes and updates in the company’s policies that need to be made in order to keep the company’s code of ethics up to date and to a professional business standard. How to Create a Code of Ethics When creating the content within the code of ethics, it is important to remember and establish immediately that The Code of ethics applies to all Widget Tech Inc. employees and directors. To create a code of ethics a company needs to look to the industry, it is important that employees, directors and stakeholders are aware that â€Å"We (Widget Tech Inc.) abide by all rules of conduct of the American Widget Manufactures Association† (Joel Saltzman, 2006) It is also important to Look outside the industry and compare current Code of Ethics with other companies in our manufacturing industry. A company must cover all aspects of business when creating their code of ethics. It is also important for a company to consider problems that might have occurred in the past, and how problems have been resolved. Widget Tech Inc. Code of Ethics As we know, a code of ethics must address the company’s ethical standards, what is expected of from every employee of Widget Tech Inc. Topics covered within the company’s code of ethics should include: * Honesty and Service - All employees will be honest with each other, customers, supervisors and subordinates. *Show MoreRelatedDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesmymanagementlab is an online assessment and preparation solution for courses in Principles of Management, Human Resources, Strategy, and Organizational Behavior that helps you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Read MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesmechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. To obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, or you may fax your request to 201-236-3290. Many of the designations by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the

Causes of world war Free Essays

Source based World war one, a great European war, nations conflicted and divided, aligning themselves with their own allies. World war one war one was a war not born from profound causes but triggered by a continents own insolence, competition and whom a nation was allied with. Each of the European nations had their own goals and motives as to why they did what they did. We will write a custom essay sample on Causes of world war or any similar topic only for you Order Now Some fought to preserve the interests that best served their nation, some fought to retaliate and some fought to become the king of Europe. A country like France ho pushed and encouraged nationalism and militarism was viewed as a powerful nation but because of Its strong policies It was also recognized as a huge threat to other European nations. A war seemed to be beneficial to every nation. Everybody was fending for themselves, For France if a war did break out especially between Germany and Russia, France would be able to attain previously lost lands from Germany. Lace and Lorraine, and this would only be a great outcome for France. Germany was another rising nation at the time, her and Russia had conflicts and a war between them seemed inevitable. Russia was trying to recover from a revolution that had occurred less than a decade ago. They had a big army but their soldiers were not well trained and their military was not well equipped to take on a nation Like Germany. Russia posed a threat to Germany but seeing as how Russia was not ready for a war, at least not yet, this was Germany’s opportunity to attack and eliminate Russia as a potential future threat. Germany only cared about herself, not other nations, not even Austria. (SOURCE B) Germany provoked a war between Austria and Serbia because Russia was going to Intervene and Germany loud have their chance. This was wishful thinking on the part of Germany. They did not want bloodshed or war, yet they provoked one because it served their nations best Interests. Another powerful nation was Britain, a country that was mostly neutral and wanted no part in war. Britain had a huge naval base that controlled most of the ports at sea; this trading system was highly beneficial for Britain because it was how their economy held up. Their economy was stable and that can only mean good things, but with a rising nation like Germany, Britain’s economy was at stake. Britain needed to stay at the top and Germany wanted to be at the top, there was only room for one, with this two powerful nations competing, a war was dawning, and so Britain allied with France to fight against Germany. Without Britain France would have lost miserably and Germany would have gained control over some of the ports threatening Britain’s supremacy over the waters. Each country was doing what was best for their own. Russia was the other nation fighting to get a stronger foothold in Europe, and just like the there nations, her too was serving her own interests. The Russians choose to align with Serbia because they both had similar political views and were both Slavic countries. This was a difficult time for Russia because of revolution that had occurred not so long ago. The Tsar was losing control and his influence over the Russian 1 OFF land in Europe and hope for that brings peace within Russia. World war one was not motivated by aggression but by mere agency of solidifying one’s nation as part of the European continent instead of ending up as an annexed territory in one’s nation. How to cite Causes of world war, Papers

Australian Consumer Law for Viagogo Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Why the ACCC considers that Viagogo has breached the ACL? Answer: The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken the Switzerland based company Viagogo to the Federal Court as more than 400 consumer complaints had been launched against the company in only a year. The ACCC have alleged that the company has violated the provisions of theAustralian Consumer Law as provided in scheduled 2 of the Australian Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2010[1] through making representations which were false and misleading along with indulging in conduct which was deceptive and misleading. The legal proceedings have been initiated against the company after the investigation into the company had been conducted by the CHOICE. The investigation found that the alleged company was involved in Opaque advertising methods and drip pricing in order to enhance its sales. The purpose of the company was to facilitate the sale of tickets by people who were not able to attend a particular event which is a legitimate purpose given the right to people to s ell tickets for event they cannot attend. However in practicality the company charging hefty fees in relation to such transactions[2]. 473 contacts have being received by the ACCC this year from Australian consumers as provided by the Deputy Chairman of ACCC Delia Rickard. It was provided by the Australian consumer watchdog that they expect all website indulging in ticket re-selling to be upfront and clear with respect to the fees charged by them along with the type of tickets sold and the characteristic of their business. It had been alleged by the ACCC that the company did not disclose unavoidable and significant fee properly in relation to the ticket price which included booking fee of 27.6% along with the handling fee[3]. Section 18(1) of theAustralian Consumer Law prohibits any person or company to indulge in action which is misleading and deceptive are likely to mislead or deceive with respect to activities of trade and Commerce[4]. The legal proceedings which have been initiated by the consumer regulator was based on the tickets sold by the company between 1st May and 26th June 2017. While advertising to sell the book of moron for $135 the company was adding an additional fee of $42.50, the tickets for Ashes which were advertise to be sold for $ 330. 15 were added with an additional fee of 96.66 and the tickets for Cat Stevens which were advertise to be sold for $450 were added with an additional fee of $29.95. This action of the company accounted to the violation of Section 29 (1) (i) of the ACL which is in relation to false and misleading representation. As per the provisions of the section a person is not allowed to make a representation which is false and misleading to the consumers in the activities of trade and commerce. This action of the company is also the contravention of section 48 (1) (a) and (b) of the ACL in relation to hidden price[5]. In addition consumers were often directed to the website of the company without their knowledge from Google search where the company had hired top search results for maximum Entertainment music and sports events. An advertisement was made by the company that they are the authorised resellers which made many consumers to purchase tickets from them without having the knowledge that the company is actually a reseller. Allegations were made by the consumer watchdog that true the use of word official the company made a representation in such advertisements that consumers would be able to purchase original and official tickets from them where actually the company was a platform to sell tickets which was sold by others. This was again the breach of section 18(1) ACL in relation to deceptive and misleading conduct as well as section 29 of ACL in relation to false and misleading representation. The company had made Statesman that only 1% of the tickets are remaining to be sold in order to create urgency among the consumers to purchase the tickets quickly when the tickets would still be obtained from other sources selling the tickets. This was a form of bait advertisement which is discussed in section 35 of the Australian consumer law[6]. According to this section the sellers must not make an advertisement to increase the demand of the product without having intention to provide them. The action can also be charged under Section 18(1) of the ACL in relation to misleading and deceptive conduct as well as section 29(1)(i) related to false and misleading representation regarding price[7]. Warning had been issued by the consumer protection bodies of WA, NSW and Queensland to the consumers from purchasing tickets from the website. A provided by the consumer protection body of WA people only found out that they had purchased tickets for a reseller which they were not allowed to en ter into an event and had to repurchase the tickets or miss out the event. In relation to the case made by the ACCC against the company it seeks injunctions, declarations, corrective publication orders, pecuniary penalties along with compliance programs and cost of legal proceedings. The decision of the court in relation to this case can have various implications on the Australian ticketing industry. Relevant powers of the ACCC to ensure compliance with the ACL The ACCC is the apex competition regulator and consumer protection agency in Australia. It is an independent government authority created by the Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 in relation to public interest. The aim of the regulator is to promote fair trading by businesses along with providing protection to the consumers with respect to the actions of businesses. Wide range of compliance tools are used by the regulator to prevent violation of the legislation including consumer and business education and working together with the stakeholders. A range of enforcement remedies have also been provided by the legislation to the ACCC which includes outcomes based on court decisions and undertakings enforced by the courts. The Australian Consumer Law is applicable at the Commonwealth level and is thenational consumer law of Australia; it is also applicable in the states and territories. Four flexible and integrated strategies are employed by the ACCC in order to achieve compli ance objective of the ACL. Firstly the ACCC enforces the law which includes solving possible contraventions both in form of litigation and administrative manner. Secondly it educates and inform consumers and businesses with respect to the responsibilities and rights under the law in order to ensure compliance. Thirdly the regulator works closely with agencies for the implementation of such strategies through coordinated approaches. Finally market studies are undertaken by the ACCC in relation to emerging competition or consumer issues for the purpose of analysing and determining any failure in relation to the market and strategies to address them. Without the ACCC operating it would not be easy to control the market The ACCC have been able to derive various orders in its favour with respect to the ACL. In the case of Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission[8] unlimited download plan had been offered by the defendant company for all users who would use their services. The plan however has several limitations which included reduction of speed after downloading a particular amount of data. It was provided by the court in this case that the use of the word unlimited was misleading and deceptive. In the case of TPG Internet Pty Ltd vAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission[9] the court had imposed 2 million pecuniary penalties on the defendant for indulging in false and misleading advertisement. The court found the use of word unlimited and misleading and deceptive. Thus in the same way the ACCC has the power to impose penalties on Viagogo for adding the word official on its website where it is merely reselling tickets. In relation to price also the ACCC can obtai n penalty against the Company. Penalties had been obtained by the ACCC through the court for similar conduct by a company in the case of ACCC v AirAsia Berhad Company[10] In this case the court ordered a pecuniary penalty of $200000. Recommendations It has been provided by the case study that E-ticketing limited has a similar business model in relation to Viagogo. If they continue to use the same business model they will bring on the risk of being prosecuted by the ACCC. Firstly the company has to understand the concept in relation to misleading and deceptive conduct as provided by section 18 of the ACL. In order to operate in accordance to law the company has to ensure that the overall impression which is created by the conduct on the company is false or inaccurate or not. While the company does not have to provide information in all situations but under specific situation all relevant information has to be provided to the consumers to ensure compliance of section 18 of the ACL. This information includes any detail which may likely create a misleading or deceptive impression on the consumer. The information should also be disclosed where it is reasonably expected by the consumer that such information would be provided. Thus if a resold ticket is not valid, the same should be informed to the consumer. In addition making an advertisement through a search engine like Google should also not be deceptive or misleading as provided in section 18 and section 29 of the Act. In relation to pricing the business has to follow the guidelines as provided by section 48 of the Act. The price should therefore be all inclusive with no hidden fee to be added on latter while purchasing the product as it would be against section 29(1)(i) and 48(1)(a) and (b) of the ACL. Bibliography ACCC Takes Ticket Reseller Viagogo To Court (2017) Australian Competition and Consumer Commission https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-ticket-reseller-viagogo-to-court. ACCC Takes Viagogo To Federal Court After More Than 400 Complaints (2017) CHOICE https://www.choice.com.au/shopping/everyday-shopping/tickets/articles/accc-takes-viagogo-to-federal-court-280817. ACCC v AirAsia Berhad Company [2012] FCA 1413 (14 December 2012). Australian Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (Cth) at Schedule 2 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 TPG Internet Pty Ltd vAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 37